			<script type="text/javascript">
			document.getElementById('wp-version-message').innerHTML = '';
			</script>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYTimes.com on WordPress?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress/</link>
	<description>A design blog with a particular emphasis on green design, design for society, and environmental technologies, Vestal Design Blog also discusses web design, product design, graphic design, and architecture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: programlar</title>
		<link>http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-46483</link>
		<dc:creator>programlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 10:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress.html#comment-46483</guid>
		<description>I donâ€™t know â€“ granted, as of March 2005 NYTimes.com was seeing 555 million pageviews per monthâ€¦ gah! ...but we built PodTech.net on WordPress, and while they donâ€™t get anywhere near that many, the system is quite robust, and with good caching, I think itâ€™d be possible. At that level, though, itâ€™s probably more worthwhile to publish to static files than to cache so agressively â€“ itâ€™s basically the same thing but would be more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t know &#226;&#8364;&#8220; granted, as of March 2005 NYTimes.com was seeing 555 million pageviews per month&#226;&#8364;&#166; gah! ...but we built PodTech.net on WordPress, and while they don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t get anywhere near that many, the system is quite robust, and with good caching, I think it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;d be possible. At that level, though, it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s probably more worthwhile to publish to static files than to cache so agressively &#226;&#8364;&#8220; it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s basically the same thing but would be more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mustaq</title>
		<link>http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-23666</link>
		<dc:creator>mustaq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress.html#comment-23666</guid>
		<description>Hi 

above commented guy&#039;s i believe you have not subscribed pro developer newsletter .if you have done you must be know more amazing fact nytime run purely in wp with some custom plugin&#039;s and php script to pull the content . One more fact from the launch us magazine  run on wp recently there jump to durpal and few CNET Network siteâ€™s run on WP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>above commented guy&#8217;s i believe you have not subscribed pro developer newsletter .if you have done you must be know more amazing fact nytime run purely in wp with some custom plugin&#8217;s and php script to pull the content . One more fact from the launch us magazine  run on wp recently there jump to durpal and few CNET Network site&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s run on WP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-21326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress.html#comment-21326</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know - granted, as of March 2005 NYTimes.com was seeing 555 million pageviews per month... gah!  ...but we built PodTech.net on WordPress, and while they don&#039;t get anywhere near that many, the system is quite robust, and with good caching, I think it&#039;d be possible.  At that level, though, it&#039;s probably more worthwhile to publish to static files than to cache so agressively - it&#039;s basically the same thing but would be more robust, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8211; granted, as of March 2005 NYTimes.com was seeing 555 million pageviews per month&#8230; gah!  ...but we built PodTech.net on WordPress, and while they don&#8217;t get anywhere near that many, the system is quite robust, and with good caching, I think it&#8217;d be possible.  At that level, though, it&#8217;s probably more worthwhile to publish to static files than to cache so agressively &#8211; it&#8217;s basically the same thing but would be more robust, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Blow</title>
		<link>http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-21314</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Blow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/2007/02/nytimescom-on-wordpress.html#comment-21314</guid>
		<description>it would be nice to think that WP  could handle the NYT but ... no way! :-) 

from the source code it appears that they are just pulling WP into the body of their template. 

I think they must have a massive (probably horrible) cms working behind the scenes.  

Awesome to note that they are using wp for their blogs through ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be nice to think that WP  could handle the NYT but &#8230; no way! <img src='http://www.vestaldesign.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>from the source code it appears that they are just pulling WP into the body of their template. </p>
<p>I think they must have a massive (probably horrible) cms working behind the scenes.  </p>
<p>Awesome to note that they are using wp for their blogs through &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

