While I think it’s great to push design in different directions, I think it’s a stretch to call this example biophilia.

True, while it does use an element of ‘nature’ in design, I think the intent to actually genuinely connect with nature is lacking. Surely, this is subjective, but I feel that panoramic views and even “architecture as danger” are better examples of biophilia.

...you’re probably wondering “dangerous architecture?” Well, an example I’ve heard of this is the 2nd story glass floor panel (a large glass compass) installed at some REI stores elicit mild, yet stimulating “fear” and sense of danger that is actually a principal of biophilia. It brings a certain dynamism back into our lives otherwise safe and arguably rather drab lives. It’s argued that this element is a controlled way to mimic the primordial fear we humans used to face when we were chased by saber-toothed tigers and other terrifying predators. ...perhaps this is why some people like a good scary movie to get the heart rate going every now and again…